
OKLAHOMA CITY (AP) - The Oklahoma Ethics Commission has issued a
public reprimand of former House Speaker Lance Cargill for
“multiple violations” of ethics rules.
The Republican’s State House Committee and Oklahoma County
Republican Committee also drew a reprimand.
The case revolves around rerouting campaign funds donated to the
state party to the county party.
Cargill resigned as speaker in January after revelations about
late property tax filings, not filing state income tax returns and
the ethics probe.
He did not immediately return calls to his office and his home
seeking comment.
The Ethics Commission issued a statement saying it found
“deliberate intent to circumvent the law” by rerouting the
donations.
It said Republican House members testified they were surprised
to learn that campaign checks they wrote to the state GOP wound up
with the county GOP.
A dozen House Republicans wrote $44,000 in checks from their
surplus campaign funds for use by the state GOP in 2004 but the
money was diverted to the county party.
Cargill issued the following statement: I certainly worked to promote the election of Republicans, but I never intended to violate any rules of the Ethics Commission, and I acted in good faith in regard to the events at issue.Although I disagree with the reprimand, I respect the role of the Commission. It is appropriate that they have investigated so that this matter can now be concluded.
Said Cargill’s attorney, Robert G. McCampbell: At the time of these events, Todd Hiett was the leader of the House Republicans, and everyone agrees that he was the one who solicited the funds. If he should have provided more information about the intended use of the funds, I am mystified why the Commission would reprimand Lance Cargill.I am also disappointed by the Commission’s procedure in issuing a public reprimand based upon testimony we have not even seen and without giving us any opportunity to respond. If we had had the opportunity, we would object based upon the facts and the law.Nevertheless, we recognize the Commission’s role as the body constitutionally vested with authority in this regard. As the Commission has now concluded the matter, we respect that determination.